Home   News   Article

UK government plans to sell off Channel 4 television network opposed by north MP, Jamie Stone.

By Gordon Calder

Get the Courier and Groat sent to your inbox every week and swipe through an exact replica of the day's newspaper

NORTH MP, Jamie Stone, has criticised government plans to sell the Channel 4 television network to the private sector and says it begs the question, why fix what isn't broken?

The Caithness, Sutherland and easter Ross MP, who is the Liberal Democrat spokesman on culture, media and sport,

hit out during a debate in the House of Commons on the government's plans.

Jamie Stone is against plans to privatise Channel 4 television network
Jamie Stone is against plans to privatise Channel 4 television network

The debate was sparked following the news that the government is currently consulting on a "change of ownership" for Channel 4 and has stated its preferred option is full sale to private ownership.

At present, the network is run on a not-for-profit basis and reinvests its money back into UK-based production companies. The model means the channel does not make any of its own programmes and allows independent producers to maintain intellectual property.

After speaking in the debate, Mr Stone, said: "The model of Channel 4 means that it is exactly what it was set up to be: radical, diverse, and innovative. It doesn't make any of its own shows but instead uses all its earnings to reinvest into UK production companies. It's a not-for-profit network, owned by the people, for the people.

"Before the pandemic, I had the privilege of visiting the NASA base in Florida. When I was there, conversation was littered with British cultural references, demonstrating Channel 4's global reach. Someone even told me that I reminded them of someone from Four Weddings and a Funeral. I'm absolutely certain that she meant Hugh Grant but there may be a chance she meant Rowan Atkinson."

He added: "In all seriousness, it seems to me that the structure of Channel 4 is fool-proof. They were tested by the pandemic and passed with flying colours, finishing 2020 with a significant financial surplus. That meant they were able to repay all their furlough money; they didn't have to take drastic measures taken by other media organisations such as mass lay-offs or pay cuts for junior staff. If the Government wants to 'talk about the future' of Channel 4, they must produce an impact assessment urgently. It begs the question, why fix what isn't broken?"

Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.

Get a digital copy of the Courier and Groat delivered straight to your inbox every week allowing you to swipe through an exact replica of the day's newspaper - it looks just like it does in print!


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More